Employment Law Update: NLRA and NLRB Disfavor Restrictive Covenants

1.7.2025

Over the past several years, in an effort to align with the protections afforded to employees under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has opposed restrictive covenants. By way of background, in May 2023, the General Counsel to the NLRB issued Memorandum GC 23-08, highlighting the status of restrictive covenants under the NLRA. The memo maintains that non-compete agreements (and many non-solicitation agreements), with few exceptions, should be deemed unlawful because they have the power to “chill” employees from engaging in activities protected under Section 7 of the NLRA, which guarantees employees certain rights, including the right to organize, bargain collectively and participate in other concerted activities for mutual aid or protection.

Recent developments demonstrate the NLRB’s increased intolerance for several types of restrictive covenants, including non-compete and non-solicitation agreements, both of which limit employees’ rights under the NLRA. In J.O. Mory, Inc., the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) found non-compete and non-solicitation provisions in an employee’s contract were unlawful for employees who did not hold supervisory or management positions. The ALJ ruled that, as drafted, the restrictive covenants were overly broad and could chill employees from engaging in protected activities. While the ALJ did not conclude that all restrictive covenants are unlawful, in this instance, the employer was ordered to rescind the provisions and notify employees the restrictive covenants were no longer enforceable. As of the publication of this blog, the decision remains pending on appeal.

The takeaway for employers is that these developments signal that the NLRB is becoming more intolerant of non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. Now is an opportune time to review and potentially revamp any restrictive covenants to ensure consistency with the latest trends in employment law. If you have questions or would like assistance reviewing your company’s restrictive covenants, you can contact Meghan Chrisner-Keefe or any member of the Wilentz Employment Team.

Tag: Employment Law Update

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up