New York Nurse Practitioners Sue for Equal Pay to Physicians

10.24.2024

On September 17, 2024, a federal class action lawsuit was filed by New York-licensed nurse practitioners alleging that while they perform the same duties as medical doctors, they are illegally paid lower wages. The suit – Burns v. State of New York, 5:24-cv-01132, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of New York – further alleges that gender discrimination is at play, since at least eighty percent (80%) of nurse practitioners are female.

The suit was filed on behalf of a class consisting of nurse practitioners employed by various agencies within the State of New York, ranging from the Office of Persons with Developmental Disabilities to correctional facilities.  The complaint specifically details the work done by five (5) nurse practitioners, in each instance comparing their work to the work done by a medical doctor.  One nurse practitioner is described as doing patient evaluations “identical to what a psychiatrist completes” and is even identified in medical records as the “psychiatrist” of record.  Other nurse practitioners are described as performing the same examinations, treatments and ordering of tests as their medical doctor colleagues, but always at a lower pay rate. 

The suit specifically points to the 2022 amendments to the New York Nurse Practitioner Modernization Act, which, among other things, allowed nurse practitioners with over three thousand six hundred (3600) hours of physician-nurse collaborative practice to provide care independently, without a written agreement or collaborative relationship with a medical doctor.

In the State of New York, pay is determined by the civil services salary grade (“SG”) system. The higher the SG, the more an individual is paid.  The suit alleges that while nurse practitioners perform services equivalent to medical doctors with SG36 or SG38, nurse practitioners are prohibited from advancing past SG24.

The suit asserts that the disparity is a result of gender discrimination or a disparate impact on females and requests not only prospective pay equity, but ten (10) years of back wages, adjustment to pension benefits and compensatory damages due to the distress caused by the discrimination.

The State of New York has yet to file a response to the complaint. Our team will continue to monitor the suit and provide updates as they become available.

Tag: Employment Law Update

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up

Tracy Armstrong Photo

Tracy Armstrong
Co-Chair, Employment Law Team
Shareholder
732.855.6020