The New Direction of the National Labor Relations Board

3.25.2025

Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”) permits employees “to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection…” The NLRA is governed by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”). The General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board sets policy objectives, regarding the NLRA by issuing memoranda. 

Section 7 of the NLRA applies to most private sector employees, meaning the rights outlined in this section generally apply to all non-supervisory employees within a covered company, regardless of whether they are unionized or not. A “covered company” under the NLRA includes private sector employers engaged in interstate commerce (with few exceptions).

The NLRA does not apply to supervisors.  The term “supervisor” means any individual having authority, in the interest of the employer, to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment.

Activity is considered “concerted” if employees are engaged in conduct with or on the authority of other employees and not solely by and on behalf of the employee himself. It includes circumstances where a single employee seeks to initiate, induce, or prepare for group action, as well as where an employee brings a group complaint to the attention of management. Activity is “protected” if it concerns employees’ interests as employees. An employee engaged in otherwise protected, concerted activity may lose the Act’s protection through misconduct.

The new direction of the NLRB appears to be a very narrow reading of the NLRA to the benefit of employers. After being General Counsel for just eleven days, William B. Cowan issued memorandum 25-05 (February 14, 2025 rescission memo). This memo rescinded or revised more than a dozen of his predecessor’s initiatives, including memos that:

-deemed employer surveillance and automated management practices questionable;

-found that most non-compete agreements violate the NLRA; and

-found that confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in separation agreements violate the NLRA.

TAKEAWAY: Section 7 of the NLRA protects employees' rights to engage in concerted activities, but recent shifts in NLRB policy may narrow these protections, especially concerning employer surveillance and contract provisions. For further clarification or questions, please do not hesitate to contact our Employment Law Team.

 

Tag: Employer Alert

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up

Tracy Armstrong Photo

Tracy Armstrong
Co-Chair, Employment Law Team
Shareholder
732.855.6020