Is it the End of Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Provisions in Severance Agreements?

3.14.2023

On February 21, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”), in McLaren Macomb, Case 07-CA-26304, held that broad confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses may not be in severance agreements that are offered to employees who are not managers, supervisors, or otherwise exempt from the protections of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). 

The following were the provisions that were reviewed:

Confidentiality Agreement. The Employee acknowledges that the terms of this Agreement are confidential and agrees not to disclose them to any third person, other than a spouse, or as necessary to professional advisors for the purposes of obtaining legal counsel or tax advice, or unless legally compelled to do so by a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction.

Non-Disclosure. At all times hereafter, the Employee promises and agrees not to disclose information, knowledge, or materials of a confidential, privileged, or proprietary nature of which the Employee has or had knowledge of, or involvement with, by reason of the Employee’s employment. At all times hereafter, the Employee agrees not to make statements to Employer’s employees or to the general public which could disparage or harm the image of Employer, its parent and affiliated entities, and their officers, directors, employees, agents, and representatives.

Please note that the Non-Disclosure provision also includes non-disparagement language. There was also a provision that provided for substantial monetary and injunctive sanctions against the employee should they breach the confidentiality or non-disclosure/non-disparagement provisions.

The NLRB held that severance agreements are unlawful if they “chill” former employees from cooperating with board investigations or discussing terms of their former employment with current employees. Specifically, the NLRB held that in “examining the language of the severance agreement…, we conclude that the non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees’ exercise of Section 7 rights.” The Section 7 rights referred to in the decision are provided in the NLRA and allow all employees (union and non-union) to “engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection,…" 

The decision may be altered or reversed on appeal.  

Takeaway: Employers wanting to use a severance agreement should consult with counsel regarding including confidentiality/non-disclosure, and non-disparagement provisions. Employers with questions can contact Tracy Armstrong or another member of the Wilentz Employment Law Team.

Tags: Employment ContractTerminated EmployeesConfidentiality Agreement

BLOG DISCLAIMER

The postings on this blog were created for general informational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice or a solicitation to provide legal services.  Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and current as of the time of publication, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.  The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship.  Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.

This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media. We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk.  We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies (including privacy policies) of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.  Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein.  We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.

We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified.

If you wish for Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., to consider representing you, please obtain contact information from the Contact Us area of this blog or go to the firm’s website at www.wilentz.com.  One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. However, the authors of Wilentz blogs are licensed only in New Jersey and/or New York and do not wish to represent anyone who viewed this site in a state where the site fails to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state.

Sign Up

Tracy Armstrong Photo

Tracy Armstrong
Co-Chair, Employment Law Team
Shareholder
732.855.6020